The Importance of Productivity in Healthcare
Productivity is a word that can often make healthcare professionals uneasy. It has an air of corporate jargon and may seem at odds with the caring, human-centered nature of their work. However, in a world of limited resources, it is important for healthcare systems to understand what they are achieving and at what cost.
The National Health Service (NHS) in the UK has embedded the “Triple Aim” of quality improvement, which includes the need to “reduce the per capita costs of healthcare” alongside improving population health outcomes and patient/staff experience. This reflects a growing emphasis on productivity and efficiency in the delivery of healthcare services.
For mental health services, the challenge of measuring productivity can be even greater. The subjective and complex nature of mental illness makes it harder to quantify “outputs” in the same way as physical healthcare interventions. However, this does not mean that productivity should be ignored. In fact, understanding productivity in mental health is crucial for ensuring resources are used effectively and services are meeting the needs of patients.
The Struggle to Measure Productivity in Mental Health
Mental health professionals often argue that their work is inherently more difficult to measure than physical healthcare. Counting the number of completed treatments or improvements in clinical markers may be straightforward in some medical fields, but assessing the impact of mental health interventions is more complex.
One key issue is the way mental health services are typically funded. Many operate on a “block contract” model, where a lump sum of funding is allocated to deliver care for a given population. This can disincentivize the granular recording of individual activities and “billable” work. Instead, the focus may be on staying within the agreed budget, rather than demonstrating performance through data.
Additionally, mental health services often involve multi-disciplinary teams providing a range of biopsychosocial interventions. The indirect input of clinicians, such as supervision and consultation, can be challenging to capture in productivity measures that prioritize direct patient contact.
The technology and information systems used in mental health services can also hinder, rather than help, the collection of meaningful data. Clinicians may find themselves spending significant time on mandatory data entry requirements that feel disconnected from their direct patient care.
The Shift Towards Outcomes-Focused Measurement
In recent years, there have been attempts to address the limitations of traditional productivity measures in mental health. The development of the Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) program in the UK, for example, has led to a focus on tracking “recovery” rates using validated tools like the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7.
However, for many traditional mental health services, robust outcome measurement remains a work in progress. Clinicians and managers often find themselves relying on process-oriented metrics, such as length of stay or appointment attendance, that provide limited insight into the quality and effectiveness of care.
The Case for Embracing Productivity Measurement
Despite the challenges, there are strong arguments for mental health services to engage more actively with productivity measurement. Firstly, in an era of constrained resources, it is essential that healthcare systems can demonstrate the value they are delivering. Productivity data can help justify investment, identify areas for improvement, and ensure equitable access to services.
Secondly, involving frontline staff in the productivity discussion can be a powerful lever for change. Clinicians have invaluable insights into what works well (and what doesn’t) in their services. By empowering them to contribute to the measurement and improvement of productivity, organizations can tap into this expertise and drive meaningful, sustainable change.
Finally, addressing the productivity gap in mental health services is not just about cost-saving; it’s about improving the quality of care and outcomes for patients. By understanding what activities contribute most to positive change, services can focus their resources where they will have the greatest impact.
Recommendations for Measuring Productivity in Mental Health
Improving the way productivity is measured in mental health services requires a multi-pronged approach:
-
Engage Clinicians: Mental health professionals should be actively involved in defining and refining productivity measures. Their expertise and frontline insights are essential for developing metrics that are meaningful and actionable.
-
Improve Data Collection: Organizations should strive to make data collection as seamless and unobtrusive as possible for clinicians. Passive data capture, intuitive technology, and feedback loops that demonstrate the value of data are all important considerations.
-
Focus on Outcomes: While process measures have a place, the ultimate goal should be to track meaningful outcomes for patients. This may involve expanding the use of validated patient-reported outcome measures and exploring novel ways to capture the impact of multi-disciplinary care.
-
Foster a Culture of Continuous Improvement: Productivity measurement should be embedded within a broader ethos of quality improvement. By empowering staff to identify and test solutions, organizations can create a virtuous cycle of data-driven change.
Conclusion
Measuring productivity in mental health services is a complex challenge, but one that cannot be ignored. By embracing this agenda and involving frontline staff, mental health organizations can unlock valuable insights, justify investment, and ultimately, improve the quality of care for their patients.
At Stanley Park High School, we recognize the importance of supporting the mental health and wellbeing of our community. By understanding the productivity and performance of local mental health services, we can better advocate for the resources and innovations needed to ensure our students and families receive the care and support they deserve.
